RGGI Carbon Leakage Monitor — PJM

Apples-to-apples model of CO₂ emissions increased by RGGI's dispatch distortion vs a counterfactual no-RGGI world.
loading...

Latest hour estimated leakage (EIA-930 grid monitor)

For the most recent hour PJM reported to EIA (~16-24h lag). Leakage extrapolated by applying the latest CAMD-confirmed month's policy-effect ratio to the EIA hourly fossil mix. Use as an indicator of current dispatch distortion magnitude — the rigorous unit-level number is in the headline cards above (T-1 month).
As-of (UTC)
Total PJM load
MW (all fuels)
Fossil load
MW (coal+gas+oil)
★ Estimated emissions leakage this hour
Estimated grid CO₂ rate
lb / MWh (all fuels)

Headline numbers · CAMD model

Latest data
RGGI price (USD/t)
Henry Hub gas ($/MMBtu)
Last 24h fossil load
Total emissions impact 24h
how much RGGI raised total emissions
Cumulative emissions impact
Emissions shifted out of RGGI 24h
activity-shift "leakage"
Emissions shifted out of RGGI · last 30d
★ citable Apples-to-apples policy effect: same model, same load, RGGI carbon adder turned on vs off — the difference is the pure dispatch distortion attributable to RGGI.   directional Observed Δ uses real CAMD measurements vs model — useful for trend, but conflates policy with ramp/transmission/must-run modeling gaps.

Scenario: what if Virginia joined RGGI?

VA has signaled intent to (re)join RGGI as soon as July 1, 2026. Our apples-to-apples model run with VA's 15 fossil units flagged as RGGI compliance — same load, same fuel costs, RGGI carbon adder applied to VA — produces the following month-of-:
VA-IN total emissions impact
model with VA in RGGI
EXTRA emissions vs. status quo
VA-IN pure leakage
shifted to non-RGGI states
EXTRA leakage from VA
VA has a relatively clean combined-cycle gas fleet plus some coal. Putting them under RGGI raises their dispatch cost, pushing more generation into non-RGGI PJM states (KY, OH, WV, PA) which run dirtier units at the margin. The leakage effect dominates the local cleaning effect — RGGI expansion makes total emissions higher, not lower.

Daily emissions: actual vs modeled (with vs without RGGI)

Actual (CAMD)  Modeled with RGGI  Modeled without RGGI  RGGI price (right axis)

RGGI price vs daily policy effect

As the RGGI allowance price rises, how does the dispatch distortion grow? Each point is one day of the analysis window.

Who is getting hurt / helped by RGGI's dispatch distortion?

▼ Top 10 RGGI plants LOSING (most recent month)

PlantStLost MWh~$ lost
loading…

▲ Top 10 non-RGGI plants GAINING (most recent month)

PlantStFuelGained MWh
loading…

▼ Top 5 corporate RGGI LOSERS (owner data pending)

OwnerLost MWh~$ lost
awaiting EIA-860 owner enrichment…

▲ Top 5 corporate non-RGGI WINNERS (owner data pending)

OwnerGained MWh
awaiting EIA-860 owner enrichment…
Most recent month: total RGGI MWh displaced
Most recent month: ~$ lost by RGGI generators
Most recent month: total non-RGGI MWh gained
12-mo rolling totals
pending
need additional months dispatched
Estimated lost / gained revenue uses a rough $10/MWh dispatch margin assumption. Real margins depend on PJM LMPs and unit-specific cost stack — true figures vary $5–$25/MWh by unit and hour. Owner mapping uses EIA-860 → EPA Power Sector crosswalk (in progress).

State / local tax revenue shift due to RGGI dispatch distortion

RGGI states losing tax revenue
monthly est.
Non-RGGI states gaining tax revenue
monthly est.
Net interstate tax shift
positive = net flow to non-RGGI
StateRGGI?Lost MWhGained MWh Tax rate $/MWhTax change $
loading…
Tax-per-MWh estimates are approximate combined state + local burden (gross-receipts/utility tax + corporate income allocation + coal severance for coal states). Refinement against state DOR data pending. Excludes property tax (unchanged by dispatch).

Top emitting units (last 30 days)

PlantUnitStateFuel RGGI?MWhCO₂ tonsPeak MWHours run
loading…